Notes on Cygnus A coronal lines

RAEF & CNT, Aug/Sep 2002
RAEF & CNT, May 2004


Observational data

Spatial distributions

Detected coronal lines (> [FeVII])

LAMBDA-AIR-ANG SPECTRUM IP_low-eV IP_up-eV TT TERM J-J LEVEL ENERGY CM-1
19645.00 [Si VI] 168.8 205.1 M1 2Po-2Po 3/2-1/2 0 - 5090.0
6374.50 [Fe X] 235.04 262.1 M1 2Po-2Po 3/2-1/2 0 - 15683.1
7891.80 [Fe XI] 262.1 290.4 M1 3P-3P 2-1 0 - 12667.9
5302.86 [Fe XIV] 361.0 392.2 M1 2Po-2Po 1/2-3/2 0 - 18852.5
19196.00 [S XI] 447.1 504.8 M1 3P-3P 0-1 0 - 5208.0
6917.00 [Ar XI] 478.7 539.0 M1 3P-3P 2-1 0 - 14453.0
7611.00 [S XII] 504.8 564.7 M1 2Po-2Po 1/2-3/2 0 - 13135.3

Discussion

The coronal line problem in Cygnus A:
links with the extended soft X-ray emission in the cones?

Deductions from the Chandra X-ray observations of the nuclear region (Young et al. 2002)

Optical-IR Coronal lines (I. van Bemmel, PhD thesis + Keck/NIRSPEC spectra)

Other constraints on the ionization parameter and density

Conclusion

It appears that a consistent model might be made in which the coronal lines are produced in a photoionized low density plasma (n_e ~ 6 cm-3), that has a high ionization parameter and electron temperature (U > 1, T_e > 10^5K), that fills the cones out to a radius of ~1kpc, and is responsible for producing the extended soft X-ray emission via electron scattering of the nuclear soft X-ray emission.

The model in which the scattering clouds are warm and have n_e ~ 60 cm-3, an electron temperature of T_e = 2x10^4K, and a covering factor within the cones of ~10%, seems less consistent with all the observations.

Outstanding questions and uncertainties

Line luminosity estimate

Using the parameters derived from the soft X-rays, a crude estimate has been made of a typical coronal line luminosity. Using the volume of a 1kpc diameter sphere and an extimate of the atomic parameters (see Excel spreadsheet), a typical line will have a luminosity of ~ 10^41 erg/s which is around 5% of the Hb luminosity from Osterbrock & Miller (1975).

References