mirror sites: PL (internal link) HQ     [?]

Health Check monitor

 

CAL | HC | refs | QC
HealthCheck Monitor
   HOME | UsersGuide
  sl icon ALL INSTRUMENTS
 
all KPI reports
MUSE:
detector:bias
Other HC:
QC links:
        [page auto-refreshes after 300 sec]   [stop | on]            [press Ctrl+Shift+R to enforce refresh of scores, dates and news]
MUSE trending system: SCORES (quick-look)
HELP USERS-GUIDE MORE
Last update: 2024-12-30T16:00:47 (UT)
  | now: 2024-12-30T17:51:24 (UT) muc09 QC pipeline: muse-2.8.8 (installed 2023-06-22)
same group: RON_master RON_det BIAS_raw_mean BIAS_raw_median BIAS_median temp
General news: NOTE: The Health Check and calChecker services are moved to qcFlow on an instrument by instrument basis. The current pages will not be updated any longer once the move has been finished.
MUSE news:  
Report news:
DATE*: [?] 2024-12-23
report | NLT
2024-12-24
report | NLT
2024-12-25
report | NLT
2024-12-26
report | NLT
2024-12-27
report | NLT
2024-12-28
report | NLT
2024-12-29
report | NLT
r...
Raw CAL displays:
raw raw raw raw raw raw raw
P...
CAL product quality:
products products products products products products products
 
transfer   ngas [?]

HC plot | FULL | history ... | plot tutorial ... | contact | HC_docu... | quality events...                 daily/often; important to check     [?]
*Date on this monitor changes at 21:00 UT
raw BIAS median for each detector (scores)
19: CHAN23
not implemented
20: CHAN21
not implemented
21: CHAN19
not implemented
22: CHAN20
not implemented
23: CHAN22
not implemented
24: CHAN24
not implemented
13: CHAN17
not implemented
14: CHAN15
not implemented
15: CHAN13
not implemented
16: CHAN14
not implemented
17: CHAN16
not implemented
18: CHAN18
not implemented
7: CHAN11
not implemented
8: CHAN09
not implemented
9: CHAN07
not implemented
10: CHAN08
not implemented
11: CHAN10
not implemented
12: CHAN12
not implemented
1: CHAN05
not implemented
2: CHAN03
not implemented
3: CHAN01
not implemented
4: CHAN02
not implemented
5: CHAN04
not implemented
6: CHAN06
not implemented


Scores

This is the quick-look version of the HealthCheck (HC) Monitor. It displays scores for each HC report. Scores are flags assessing the compliance of data points with configured thresholds. A green score indicates that the corresponding instrument component is performing as expected (OK) in the monitored time range. A red score is the result of a parameter exceeding these thresholds, and may indicate a problem.

Scoring has both an automatic and an interactive component. The automatic part consists of monitoring, pipeline-processing, and flagging new data once per hour, 24/7. The interactive component is the certification step which is performed by the QC scientist. It involves the analysis of red scores: A confirmation of their validity, an assessment of the severity of the red score and its cause, and often an analysis comment in the AB monitor. In cases of serious instrument issues, feedback to Paranal operations and/or USD is given. However, this analysis step cannot be guaranteed to be available at the same time as the automatic scoring. Do not expect new analysis results during weekends, holidays or other off-duty times.

The last score, per plot, will determine the current plot score, which is displayed as a larger symbol. The other, older plot scores display only the recent history of instrument scores. As part of the automatic scoring, a red score will be automatically overwritten by any new data that produce a green score. The date of any score can be seen by mousing over its score symbol. As part of the interactive analysis, there is also the possibility for the QC scientist to manually adjust thresholds and turn a red score into a green one, or to delete a false red score. Often this occurs after interaction with Paranal staff, after discussing the significance of the alert score. Use the 'contact' link to get in touch.

If available, a table with quality comments is displayed on the scores&comments page, usually offering additional information about data with red scores. A comment may refer to the quality of the pipeline products and not necessarily to the exact parameter scored in this report. Quality comments are entered by the QC scientist as part of the analysis workflow.

Scores are based on the QC data for the last 7 days before the indicated date. This date is always the last date with data for this report.

The 'Quality comments' are collected from the QC scientist certification review and are available for certified nights.

Information on demand:
- scroll over the small symbols and see the individual dates of the underlying data.
- click on them and see the detailed score report for that particular data set.

More ...