Circinus: ESO Test report

EEV 44-82 -1-A57
CCD name : Circinus
Serial number : 9253-13-02
Type : Backside, Single layer AR Pixel size 15x15 µm
Number of photosensitive pixels 2048 x 4102 [HxV]
Number of outputs : 2
Overall rating :

Measurement made by Boris Gaillard the: 23 28 May 2001
Data reduced by Boris Gaillard and Fabrice Christen the: 05 June 2001

Quantum Efficiency, PRNU

Clock mode: 225kpx/rr/HG/512
Conversion Factor=   0.56348e-/ADU ±0.001367     for 20699.4ADU                                                                  
RMS noise        =   3.8613e-      ±0.1704                                                                                       

CCD temperature : -120.0Cº


Window area is : X1= 2219 X2= 4232 Y1= 15 Y2= 496
Bandwidth 5nm

Wav.       QE%                   PRNU rms%       Phase=                                                                                                    
320        52.7     ±1.5         3.78            6.758838                                                                                                  
330        59.4     ±1.7         3.63            6.716986                                                                                                  
340        62.8     ±1.2         3.56            6.697626                                                                                                  
350        63.9     ±0.63        3.62            6.71402                                                                                                   
360        66.3     ±0.66        3.6             6.710535                                                                                                  
370        70       ±0.69        3.21            6.599636                                                                                                  
380        75.9     ±0.75        2.42            6.321756                                                                                                  
390        81.2     ±0.83        1.89            6.076339                                                                                                  
400        83.6     ±0.85        1.59            5.904734                                                                                                  
420        85       ±0.86        1.33            5.727224                                                                                                  
440        85.7     ±0.86        1.29            5.697629                                                                                                  
460        84.7     ±0.85        1.13            5.556611                                                                                                  
480        83       ±0.83        1.29            5.691469                                                                                                  
500        82.5     ±0.89        1.22            5.639693                                                                                                  
520        82       ±0.82        1.09            5.518802                                                                                                  
540        80.7     ±0.81        1.25            5.663516                                                                                                  
560        79.8     ±0.59        1.13            5.563032                                                                                                  
580        78.8     ±0.79        1.27            5.680919                                                                                                  
600        77.7     ±0.64        1.16            5.589927                                                                                                  
620        76.7     ±0.75        1.25            5.665014                                                                                                  
640        75.6     ±0.74        1.02            5.457629                                                                                                  
660        73.6     ±0.71        1.06            5.497646                                                                                                  
680        71.2     ±0.68        1.11            5.541661                                                                                                  
700        68.1     ±0.64        1.15            5.584154                                                                                                  
720        65.6     ±0.6         1.18            5.602041                                                                                                  
740        62.6     ±0.57        1.42            5.798764                                                                                                  
760        59.2     ±0.53        1.24            5.649753                                                                                                  
780        55.6     ±0.49        1.36            5.752489                                                                                                  
800        51.1     ±0.44        1.57            5.899591                                                                                                  
820        46.7     ±0.4         1.57            5.896596                                                                                                  
840        42.2     ±0.35        1.47            5.821398                                                                                                  
860        36.8     ±0.31        1.32            5.718015                                                                                                  
880        31.3     ±0.25        1.67            5.950236                                                                                                  
900        25.9     ±0.21        2.07            6.178489                                                                                                  
920        20.3     ±0.16        2.85            6.448373                                                                                                  
940        15.6     ±0.12        4.2             6.802537                                                                                                  
960        11.5     ±0.088       5.21            6.986774                                                                                                  
980        7.71     ±0.058       6.4             7.142319                                                                                                  
1000       4.52     ±0.034       7.64            7.281916                                                                                                  
1040       0.805    ±0.006       8.43            7.4466                                                                                                    
1100       0.0914   ±0.00068     11.9            7.862381                                                                                                  

Table 1: Measurement of the Quantum Efficiency.

Figure 1: Graphic representation of the QE.
Figure 2: Graphic representation of the PRNU.

Quantum efficiency, comparison

In this section you can compare the QE we measured with the testbench and

Figure 3: Comparison between the QE measured by ESO, the QE measured by Marconi, ESO specification and minimum specification.

Figure 4: Ratio between the ESO measurements and the ESO minimum specification.



Difference between QE measurements made by ESO and Marconi.

Comparison QE ESO / QE Marconi

Wavelength (nm)

QE ESO (%)

QE Marconi (%)

Difference (Eso - Marc. %)

Relative difference (Marconi as reference %)

Ratio QE ESO Canis Minor / QE Marconi

350

63.9

61.4

2.5

4.1

1.04


83.6

84

-0.4

-0.5

1

500

82.5

81.4

1.1

1.4

1.01

650

74.6

73

1.6

2.2

1.02

900

25.9

27.1

-1.2

-4.4

0.96

Table 2: Difference and relative difference between ESO measurements and Marconi.

Figure 6: Graphic representation of the difference and the relative difference.

Figure 7: Ratio between the ESO measurements and the Marconi measurements



Cosmetic

flat field

For the flat field we use three wavelengths, 350nm, 600nm and 900nm. For each wavelength we make two images, high level (45000 ADU) and low level (1000 ADU).

350nm (UV), bandwidth 5nm

600nm, bandwidth 5nm

900nm, bandwidth 5nm

High level
Low level
High level
Low level
High level
Low level

Table 3: Flat field for three wavelengths.

Bias and dark

The time exposure, for the long dark exposure, is 3600 seconds.

Bias

Long exposure dark image

Table 4: Bias and dark.



Readout noise/Conversion factor

Left readout port
Clock mode: 225kpx/rlrl/HG/512
Conversion Factor=   0.56839e-/ADU ±0.002489     for 20231.7ADU                                                                  
RMS noise        =   4.5071e-      ±0.4465                                                                                       

right readout port
Clock mode: 225kpx/rr/HG/512
Conversion Factor=   0.56596e-/ADU ±0.001808     for 19794.3ADU                                                                  
RMS noise        =   4.6345e-      ±0.3434                                                                                       

Left readout port
Clock mode: 50kpx/rlrl/HG/512
Conversion Factor=   0.61558e-/ADU ±0.002689     for 19696.1ADU                                                                  
RMS noise        =   2.9649e-      ±0.336           

Right readout port
Clock mode: 50kpx/rlrl/HG/512
Conversion Factor=   0.61461e-/ADU ±0.00252      for 19638.3ADU                                                                  
RMS noise        =   2.2884e-      ±0.115                                                                                        

Linearity (TDI method)

RMS non linearity (%)         =    0.5
Peak to peak non linearity (%)=    1.4



Figure 5: Error of linearity

Figure 6: Residual non linearity.

Dark current

Exposure time (s) = 3600
Dark current : 0.44 ± 0.02 ADU/hour/pixel
Dark current : 0.24 ± 0.01 e-/hour/pixel

Charge Transfer Efficiency (CTE)

High level (Around 25000 ADU)
Horizontal CTE = 0.999996
Vertical CTE   = 0.9999996

Cosmetic defects

In this section we expose the hot pixel, the dark pixel, the trap and the very large trap we found.

Hot pixel

A hot pixel provides a signal of > 60 e- / pixel / hour.


Result: 11 hot points.


Position

X=
Y=
185
1751
242
188
1854
1911
933
1913
1913
1913
1913
2074
2193
2238
2611
3729
3729
3743
4022
4025
4026
4027
Total hot pixel: 11

Table 5: Position and images of the hot pixels.

Dark pixel

A dark pixel is one with 50% or less than the average output for uniform intensity light level, measured with a flat field level around 500 photo-electrons.


Result: 0 dark pixels detected.


Position


Total hot pixel: 0

Table6: Position and images of the dark pixels.

Trap

A trap is defined as a pixel that captures more than 10 electrons, measured with a flat field level around 500 photo-electrons.


Result: Not available

Very large trap

A very large trap is defined as a pixel that captures more than 10 000 electrons, measured with a flat field level around 90% of full well capability.


Result: Not available.


Bad column

A bad column is 10 or more contiguous hot or dark pixels in a single column or a very bright pixel or a very large trap.


Result: 2 bad columns.


Position Image

X= 1944, Y= 925
X= 1942, Y= 925
Total hot pixel: 2

Table 7: Position and images of the bad columns. The values in the table are in ADU. Conversion factor: 1.1 e-/ADU

Conclusion

Here is a summary of cosmetic defects:


Hot pixel

Dark pixel

A very bright pixel (a)

Trap

Very large trap (b)

Sup. 10 contiguous pixels (c)

Total bad column (a+b+c)

ESO

11

0

/

/

/

2

2

Marconi

19

10

2

0

0

10

Table 8: Summary of cosmetic defects.


Be careful, in the ESO test report we didn't include the very large trap in the total bad column because for this ccd we couldn't measure this parameter.


Back to the overview page ESO Test Reports for the OmegaCAM CCDs