|
EUROPEAN SOUTHERN OBSERVATORY
|
La Silla Observatory
SCIENCE OPERATION DEPARTMENT
Minute of the SciOp meeting held on 2003-08-13:
Concerns about science operation of La Silla
LSO-MIN-ESO-90000-4
|
Prepared |
Olivier Hainaut |
2003-08-13 |
Reviewed
|
SciOp and JMelnick
|
2003-08-20
|
Released
|
J.Melnick
|
2003-08-21
|
Revision History
0.2
|
2003-08-13 first draft, ohainaut |
1.0
|
2003-08-20 include review comments, ohainaut |
1.- INTRODUCTION
1.1- PURPOSE and SCOPE
On
2003-08-13, SciOp meeting was held, with very broad participation from
SciOp Department members (at LS, SC and La Serena), with Jorge Melnick,
to discuss various concerns and issues.
A document had been prepared ("Concerns about science operation of La
Silla" [1]) by L.Schmidtobreick with input from many astronomers and
some TIOs and OpEng to summarize these concerns. It was used as a basis
for discussion during the meeting.
The present document summarises the discussion, and lists the various actions that are taken to solve the issues presented.
1.2- STYLISTIC CONVENTION
Text in italic
correspond to citations from another document. By default, they are
from [1]. Where some text has been edited out, it is replaced by [...]. Text in red indicate an important change of procedure or action starting immediately. A star * indicate a sentence that has been modified or added during the review process.
1.3- ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS
SciOp: La Silla Science Operation Department
OpA: Operation Astronomers, 80/20%
OpEng: Operation Engineers
1.4- DOCUMENTS AND REFERENCES
2.- MINUTES
2.1- SciOp staffing plan
The situation as we see it right now is:
- four persons will leave
before end of the year or have left already (George, Rene', Jon
and Michael; Michael has been replaced by Ivo, Jon by
Cedric, but this leaves a fellow and an OPA less, so still
4 people less) and no replacement is forseen -> 400 nights lost
- by middle next year three
more people will leave or have reduced duty (Malvina,
Lisa, Linda), and no replacement is forseen ->
another 160 nights lost
- Vanessa is in sick/maternity
leave until indefinite date...temporary replacement
looked for, but not yet found
- two more TIO positions will be cut by the end of the year
We believe that with all these losses
a full operation of the telescopes is not possible anymore. For a
normal operation we need at least three support/service astronomers (1
per telescope) plus one shift-leader/background astronomer who can also
help out the other three in case of time-overlapping duties (e.g.
calibration + introduction), three night TIOs (for telescope and
instrument operation), three day TIOs (maintanance, startup,
calibration) and one OpEng for day operation in backup. [...]
The OpA position of C.Foellmi was never a real position: it had been
assembled from bits and pieces of contract ends that were floating
around. So, that man power was an "extra" to compensate for nights that
had been lost before.
The Staffing Plan, as described in [2], considers that in until the end
of 2003 (i.e. nominal end of WFI operation), SciOp would have:
- 5 Staff Astro, 3 OpAs, 4 Fellows, i.e. 1250n/yr, or 3.42 astro/night
- 14 TIOs, i.e. 6.09 TIO/day
- 2 OpEng
and after the end of WFI operation:
- 4 Staff Astro, 3 OpAs, 3 Fellows, i.e. 1065n/yr or 2.92 astro/night
- 12 TIOs, i.e. 5.22 TIO/day
- 2 OpEng
WFI Era: The goal of 1 astro per telescope + 1 background
astronomer is partially met from the staffing plan point of view. The
actual schedule statistics indicate that 3.4 astronomers were present
on average.
Similarly, the goal of 6 TIOs is also met. The recent situation of having 5 TIOs was caused by i/ accumulated vacations that were finally taken, ii/ sick leaves and iii/ cross training of TIOs on different telescopes.
As the VST has been delayed, WFI will continue operation. The best
estimate available today is that Omega-Cam commissioning could start in
Oct.2004 andVST could be offered in Apr.2005.
As a consequence: all the positions corresponding to WFI operations are extended until VST operation starts, i.e. at least October 2004. In practice, this implies that
- we keep the 14 TIO positions, that R.Mendez' position will remain
(with replacement of Rene when needed) and that a departing fellow will
be replaced to keep 4 fellows.
- two TIO positions will be closed at La Silla at the time we stop
operating WFI, corresponding to the opening of 2 TIO positions at VST.
The objective is that 2 SciOp TIOs will be transfered to VST, selected
among the SciOp TIOs that show interest for these positions and that are
considered to have the abilities to become successful VST TIOs.
To be crystal clear: if the TIOs interested by the VST positions do not
convince us (their direct supervisor + ohainaut + jmelnick) that they
will be successful VST TIOS, their automatic transfer will not
be approved: we are not going to send someone to fail at VST. The goal,
however, is that by that time, all SciOp TIOs will be fully
"compliant".
Post-WFI Era: In the Post-WFI
era, NTT and 3.6m will continue to be fully operated. 2.2m will be
operated only with FEROS during ESO time (i.e. 2/3 of the time), with
reduced TIO support. During MPE time, 2.2m will be offered with WFI and
possibly GROND with no astro support, but with some TIO support. It is
hoped that some consortium will purchase WFI time, making additional
resources available.
JMelnick stressed that the numbers of positions in the Staffing Plan
are
strict: additional positions are out of the question. As a consequence,
we should not adjust the number of people to what we want to do, but on
the contrary, what we do to the number of people we have. Another
important remark is that it is obvious that reduced staff will cause an
increase of down-time. While the measuring system may have to be
adjusted in the future, the new limit in the current system would be
~5% technical down-time.
2.2- SPECIFIC PROBLEMS
If
La Silla is to be kept open as proposed by 2006+ and desired by the
community, ESO standard should be assured, which means that enough
people have to be employed to operate the telescopes and
instruments. Otherwise, the working conditions and atmosphere on
La Silla will become poor and it will be even more difficult to find
people to fill the positions than it is now. Further consequences are
of course a much higher downtime statistic as well as lower quality
science.
As examples we give the following list of annoying things that have happened during the last months
- Sometimes:
- no TIO support during
visitors' nights/days (2p2) Comments: Usually there is a TIO for the
night and no day support (startup, day operation), very seldom the
other way round.
- Startup of the
telescope done by astronomer Comment: Astros have only basic knowledge
of how to bring systems up. If something goes wrong, they need
someone who can help. Possibility that if everyone else is busy
bringing up other telescopes, the telescope might not be ready to start
the night.
As indicated above, the staffing plan consider that we
should have 6 TIOs most of the time. More care will be taken for the
scheduling to ensures that we actually do have 6 TIOs most of the
time. Nevertheless, there will
be occasions in which only 5 TIOs are available. In that case, the
default configuration is 2 days, 2 night and 1 midday-midnight TIOs,
and the default distribution is that the midday/night TIO is on the
2p2. Nevertheless other combinations can be chose on a case by case. In
the default configuration, the 3p6 and NTT TIOs should give support to
the 2p2 (provided that it does not cause problems on these telescopes).
This will remain a "sometimes" issue.
*When the Service Astronomer finishes the night alone:
- the astronomer will park and close the telescope from the RITZ,
- one of the DAY TIO will go to the dome at ~08 o'clock to check that everything is OK and to refill the dewar.*
Nevertheless, in case of emergency (eg unforeseen sick leave), any
configuration can be considered till the end of the emergency (eg have
an OpA or an Astro replacing a TIO, or a TIO replacing an astro,
special transport to bring someone in, etc). This should be an
"exceptional" issue.
- Often:
- Working shifts during day and
night (e.g. service + calibration) Comment: While this happens on all
telescopes, at the 2p2 this situation is standard during service mode
operation. Astros and TIOs agree that the astro leaves the queue filled
with relevant calibrations and the TiO executes it. But however, if
something goes wrong, the astro will be held responsible since it is
their job to check the calibrations.
During the discussion, it was pointed out that the only efficient way to check the calibrations is when they are taken. As they are taken by the TIOs, the TIOs will be trained, and mini-procedures will be written so that the TIOs can certify the calibs. *The
procedures/check-lists will include MIDAS/IRAF scripts that do some
simple tests and produce some values to be logged on the check-list and
compared with a range of valid values*.
The astronomer will have then only to deal with rejected calibrations, which should be "exceptional".
- First night up already on service
Should happen only exceptionally. More care will be taken
to avoid this to the max, bringing this issue to the "exceptional"
level.
- Too often:
- service nights or at least
second part without TIO (2p2 mainly) Comment: The service observer
knows how to run the telescope and fix the basic problems **depending
on their experience**. The service observer may not immediately
understand what the problem is when it occurs whereas a TIO knows
exactly the symptoms and how to fix the problems when they occur.
i.e. astros are much less efficient without a TIO [...].
New rule:
if a problem arises after the night TIO of the telescope has left, and
if nobody at RITZ knows how to solve it, the problem is to be reported
and the telescope shall be closed.
Obviously, this will result in a higher down time. * This policy starts
immediately.
It must however be noted that this increase of total down
time should not be accompanied or caused by a large number of small
problem reports. *
- Doing service and introducing a new astronomer for the next days
This should not happen. More care will be taken to avoid this to the max, bringing this issue to the "exceptional" level.
- Doing calibration for/with visitor in the afternoon (mainly NTT and 2p2)
The visitors have to be trained until they can take their
calibrations only with the assistance of the TIO. At that level, the
Support Astro does not have to babysit the visitor, just to be
available for assistance if required. Note that the same is true for
night support. Also note that the CALOB tool should reduce the quantity
of afternoon calibrations to a mimimum.
In order to aleviate the load on the WFI service observers, more astronomers will be trained to perform service on WFI *
- Working more than the agreed days for La Silla in Vitacura, because of the goals and objectives and few time to really work on them when we are on La Silla.
The contract of the fellows specifies that they have to
perform 35days of duties for the observatories when in Vitacura. Until
now, this has never been enforced and, at the time of the SciOp Re-engineering, the concensus was that the amount
of duty work in Vitacura does not (or did not?) amount to 35d. The job
descriptions [4] and the SciOp Astronomy Operation Plan [5] indicate that "These 35d are used to ensure the
continuity of their service to SciOp (e.g. read SciOp email, reply to
those concerning them directly, complete urgent tasks, etc.), and
perform background tasks such as documentation, analysis, etc. The
Fellows are not expected to keep detailed track of their time in
Vitacura, but experience (+ time record from some template fellows)
shows that this does not amount to 35d. The remainder is considered as
a compensation for possible over-run of their 80n quota on La Silla
(not to be abused, and to be kept at a small level, e.g. no more than
10%), required by emergency situations or schedule impossibilities".
For the Staff and OpAs, their contract indicates the number of nights
to be spent on La Silla, but does not specify anything about Vitacura.
The job descriptions [4] indicate that "It is expected from the OpA that he will remain informed
while being in Vitacura, by reading emails and replying to urgent
emails related to his duties, and perform/complete urgent tasks related
to his duties for SciOp. This should take a very small fraction of his
research time".
It should be noted that the night statistics for La Silla
astronomers are following extremely strictly the contractual
constraints, as listed in the table below for the last accounting
period (running from 2002-Q4 till 2003-Q3).
Name
|
Nights/Contract
|
Notes
|
M.Billeres
|
82/80
|
|
Th.Dall
|
78/80
|
|
V.Doublier
|
88/105
|
sick leave
|
C.Foellmi
|
121/125
|
OpA contract ending
|
L.Germany
|
93/80
|
|
O.Hainaut
|
109/105
|
|
G.Hau
|
60/80
|
End of contract in Q2
|
G.LoCurto
|
130/125
|
|
R.Mendez
|
130/105
|
|
E.Pompei
|
105/105
|
|
J.Pritchard
|
128/125
|
|
I.Saviane
|
78/80
|
|
F.Selman
|
111/125
|
|
Nevertheless, as of today (2003-08-14) and until 2003-09-30, we will
perform the following experiment, which consists in enforcing strictly what is said above about the staff.
- Background duty work in Vitacura should be avoided.*
- When receiving a message related to duties, acknowledge
reception indicating when you will deal with it (something like the 2d
day of next stay at la Silla). In case of urgent mails, pass them to
lasilla@eso.org
This shall be valid for all astronomers (Staff, OpAs and Fellows). Depending on the outcome, if extended, we will rediscuss the issue of the 35days of the fellows.
(Note for Emanuella: this cancels the request I had made for accounting of your duty time in Vitacura).
- Being shift-leader when doing night work
This should not happen. More care will be taken to avoid this to the max, bringing this issue to the "exceptional" level.
While not all of these things
happened to everybody, and people are variedly sensitive to them, we
all agree that these points are of course acceptable in emergency
situations, but that the number of occurance of emergency situations is
increasing, which is due to the fact that less and less people are
working on La Silla. We believe that the point is reached, where
no more cuts of personnel is possible without a significant impact on
the functioning of the telescopes.
As already stated above, JMelnick stressed that the numbers of positions in the Staffing Plan are
strict: additional positions are out of the question. As a consequence,
we should not adjust the number of people to what we want to do, but on
the contrary, what we do to the number of people we have.
--oOo--